DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173867

Reliability and credibility analysis of Inlow’s 60 second diabetic foot screening tool for diabetic foot risk stratification and its feasibility in India: a systematic review

Madhivadhanam Parasuraman, Bhanumati Giridharan, G. Vijayalakshmi

Abstract


Diabetes is the common cause for amputation of lower limb. Foot ulcers and associated complications are important causes of mortality and morbidity in patients with diabetes. Hence, it is important to predict diabetic foot ulcer in its early stages to eliminate the risks of foot amputation. Inlow’s 60 second diabetic foot ulcer screening tool is gaining immense attention over the years which is associated with its simplicity to use, rapid detection of high risk diabetic feet, and provides referral for patients necessitating treatment. A systematic review is conducted to assess the reliability and credibility of using Inlow’s 60 second diabetic foot screening tool for diabetic foot risk stratification and to examine its feasibility in the Indian context. Eight studies suited the inclusion criteria which were analysed systematically. The findings of the paper reveal that the sixty second tool acts as a better tool for diabetic foot ulcer risk stratification; however, modifications are necessary for its application in the Indian context.


Keywords


Credibility, Diabetic foot ulcer, Inlow’s 60 second tool, Reliability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3(11):e442.

Wu SC, Driver VR, Wrobel JS, Armstrong DG. Foot ulcers in the diabetic patient, prevention and treatment. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(1):65-76.

Jeffcoate W, Bakker K. World Diabetes Day: footing the bill. Lancet (London, England). 2005;365(9470):1527.

Boulton AJM, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet (London, England). 2005;366(9498):1719-24.

Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047-53.

Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L. The diabetic foot: The scope of the problem. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(11):S3-8.

Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005;293(2):217-28.

International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas Sixth Edition Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation. 6th ed. Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2013:1-169.

Boulton AJM, Armstrong DG, Albert SF, Frykberg RG, Hellman R, Kirkman MS, et al. Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1679-85.

Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum WH, Schaper NC. Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24(S1):S181-7.

Crawford F, Inkster M, Kleijnen J, Fahey T. Predicting foot ulcers in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM. 2006;100(2):65-86.

Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Cohen V, Nelson KM, Heagerty PJ. Prediction of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Occurrence using commonly available clinical information: the Seattle diabetic foot study. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(6):1202-7. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.2337/dc05-2031

Monteiro-Soares M, Boyko EJ, Ribeiro J, Ribeiro I, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Risk stratification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review. Diabetol. 2011;54(5):1190-9.

Inlow S. The 60-second foot exam for people with Diabetes. Wound Care Ca. 2004;2(2):10-1.

Woodbury MG, Sibbald RG, Ostrow B, Persaud R, Lowe JM. Tool for rapid and amp; easy identification of high risk diabetic foot: validation and amp; Clinical Pilot of the Simplified 60 Second Diabetic Foot Screening Tool. Santanelli, di Pompeo d’Illasi F, editor. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0125578.

Carreau L, Niezgoda H, LeBlond S, Trainor A, Orsted H, Woodbury MG. A prospective, descriptive study to assess the reliability and usability of a rapid foot screen for patients with diabetes mellitus in a complex continuing care setting. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2013;59(1):28-34.

Murphy CA, Laforet K, Da Rosa P, Tabamo F, Woodbury MG. Reliability and predictive validity of Inlow’s 60-Second Diabetic Foot Screen Tool. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012;25(6):261-6.

Din SA El, Mekkawy MM, Besely WN, Azer` SZ. Prevalence of risk factors for Egyptian diabetic foot ulceration. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci. 2016;5(2):45-57.

Orsted H. Development of the Inlow 60- second Diabetic foot screen: a practice-ready bedside tool to guide assessment and care. Wound Care Can. 2009;7(2):40-2.

Inlow S. 60-second Diabetic foot screen. Can Assoc wound Care. 2004;2(2):10-1.

Sibbald. Screening for the high risk diabetic foot: a 60-Second Tool. Modif from Int Diabetes Fed Int Work Gr Diabet Foot. 2008;1-2.

Dominic A, Kumari MJ, S DSB, Sheela AM. Risk stratification of Diabetic foot ulcers among the Patients with Diabetes mellitus at a tertiary care Hospital. Int J Adv Res. 2013;3(9):923-7.

Mwandri M. The outcome of using the 60-second diabetic foot screen to identify the diabetic foot at risk in Tanzania. Wound Heal South Africa. 2012;5(2):1-4.

Lowe J, Sibbald RG, Taha NY, Lebovic G, Martin C, Bhoj I, et al. The Guyana diabetes and foot care project: a complex quality improvement intervention to decrease diabetes-related major lower extremity amputations and improve diabetes care in a lower-middle-income country. PLoS Med. 2015;12(4).

Bethel KR. In patients with Type 2 diabetes, what impact does the American Diabetes Association foot care guidelines have in preventing lower extremity complications?. 2015. Available at http://www.nursinglibrary.org/vhl/handle/10755/577474.

Mamo T, Yifter H, Lemessa T. Risk factors assessment of diabetic foot ulcer using the sixty seconds screening tool: a hospital based cross-sectional study at Tikur Anbessa specialized Hospital. Ethiop Med J. 2015;2:45-9.

Pham H, Armstrong DG, Harvey C, Harkless LB, Giurini JM, Veves A. Screening techniques to identify people at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a prospective multicenter trial. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(5):606-11.

Boike AM, Hall JO. A practical guide for examining and treating the diabetic foot. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002;69(4):342-8.

American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2010. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(1):S11-61.

Sibbald RG, Ayello EA, Alavi A, Ostrow B, Lowe J, Botros M, et al. Screening for the high-risk diabetic foot: a 60-second tool (2012). Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012;25(10):465-76.

McDonald A, Shah A, Wallace WC. Diabetic foot education and Inlow’s 60-second foot screen. Diabet Foot Canada. 2013;1(1):18-32.

Bakker K, Acker K van. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. International Diabetes Federation; 2017. Available from: http://iwgdf.org/

Sibbald. Generic- simplified 60-second screen for the high-risk diabetic foot. Modif from Int Diabetes Fed Int Work Gr Diabet Foot. 2008;1-2. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, seventh edition. International Diabetes Federation; 2017. Available at http://www.diabetesatlas.org.

Kumpatla S, Kothandan H, Tharkar S, Viswanathan V. The costs of treating long-term diabetic complications in a developing country: a study from India. J Assoc Physicians Ind. 2013;61(2):102-9.

Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum WH, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Schaper NC. International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and the prevention of the diabetic foot. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16:S84-92.

Foot Care. Indian health diabetes best practice foot care. Indian Health Service Division of Diabetes Treatment and Prevention; 2011. Available at https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:PJ7aK7xy3kMJ:https://www.ihs.gov/MedicalPrograms/Diabetes/HomeDocs/Tools/BestPractices/2011_BP_FootCare_508c.pdf+&cd=9&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in.