DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20214360

One inch incision-mesh plug repair versus laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal repair of the primary indirect inguinal hernia: a prospective comparative study

Mohamed F. Abdelhalim

Abstract


Background: Management of inguinal hernia by minimally invasive incision and minimal dissection with optimal outcomes remains an unmet need for general surgeons. The most common hernia repair procedures are Lichtenstein hernioplasty and laparoscopic hernia repair; TAPP and TEP. The modification of mesh plug repair (MPR); one inch incision-MPR (OI-MPR); could achieve optimal outcomes comparable to that of laparoscopic hernia repair. The objective of the study was to assess OI-MPR approach for management of primary indirect inguinal hernia and its outcomes in comparison to laparoscopic TAPP repair.

Methods: During the period from September 2017 to March 2019, 63 patients with indirect inguinal hernia were selected randomly to one of two groups; group-A included 35 patients underwent one inch incision-mesh plug repair (OI-MPR), group-B included 28 patients underwent laparoscopic TAPP.

Results: The mean operative time of group-A was 31.74±4.74 min which was significantly shorter than that of group-B (81.22±7.44 min). The mean hospital stay duration in group-A was 0.57±0.18 day and in group-B, it was 1.18±0.39 day. The patients of group-A returned to normal physical activities earlier than the patients of group-B. The duration of postoperative pain was shorter and less severe in group-A than that of group-B. Regarding complications, there was no statistically significant difference found between both groups.

Conclusions: One inch incision-MPR is a simple, feasible and cost-effective approach with low morbidities and low burden on the patients and the healthcare facilities.

Keywords


Inguinal hernia, Mesh plug repair, TAPP, Hernia repair

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hayashi Y, Miyata K, Yuasa N, Eiji T,. Yasutomo G., Hideo M. et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of open inguinal hernia repair: comparison of the Prolene Hernia System and the Mesh Plug method. Surg Today. 2014;44:2255-62.

Legutko J, Pach R, Solecki R, Matyja A, Kulig J. The history of treatment of groin hernia. Folia Med Cracov. 2008;49(1-2):57-74.

Kulacoglu H. Current options in inguinal hernia repair in adult patients. Hippokratia. 2011;15(3):223-31.

Mahmoudvand H, Forutani S, Nadri S. Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Surgical Repair in Inguinal Hernia with Classic versus Preperitoneal Methods on Reduction of Postoperative Complications. BioMed Research International. 2017;3785302.

Radek P, Faye R, Leo K, Miroslav R. Advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal preperitoneal approach and total extraperitoneal approach versus open repair of inguinal hernia. Military Medical Science Letters. 2013;82:25-31.

Matthews R, Leigh N. Inguinal Hernia in the 21st Century: An Evidence-Based Review. Current problems in surgery. 2008;45:261-312.

Uwe S, Stefan N, Orestis L, Boris JW, Ines G. Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Surgery. 2017;17.

Millikan KW, Cummings B, Doolas A. The Millikan Modified Mesh-Plug Hernioplasty. Arch Surg. 2003;138(5):525-30.

Vinay S, Rahul P, Animesh V. Is lichtenstein's tension free repair still the gold standard for inguinal hernia in the era of minimally invasive surgery?. International Journal of Scientific Research. 2019;8:40-2.

Yunxiao L, Yunxiao C, Bin W, Weibing D, Yueming X. Comparison of endoscopic surgery and Lichtenstein repair for treatment of inguinal hernias: A network meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99:e19134.

Kirsty M, Wake BL, Cyntthia F, Luke V, Juan P et al. Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review. Hernia: the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery. 2005;9:109-14.

Alan W. Robbins and Ira M. Rutkow. Mesh plug repair and groin hernia surgery. Surgical Clinics.1998;78(6):1007-23.

Francesco G, Salvatore M, Francesco A, Michele C, Francesca C, Maria V et al. New "all-in-one" device for mesh plug hernioplasty: The Trabucco repair. Annali italiani di chirurgia. 2015;86:570-4.

Destek S, Gul VO. Comparison of Lichtenstein Repair and Mesh Plug Repair Methods in The Treatment of Indirect Inguinal Hernia. Cureus. 2018;10(7):e2935.

Saeed K, Shiryazdi S, Mohammad Z, Mirshamsi M, Ahmadi S, Hossein N. Comparison postoperative short-term complications after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein tension free inguinal hernia repair: A randomized trial study. Minerva chirurgica. 2014;70.

Alberto A, Cavalli M, Giancarlo M, Lombardo F, Bonitta G et al. Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair. Hernia. 2019;23.

Waite KE, Herman MA, Doyle PJ. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. J Robotic Surg. 2016;10:239-44.

Waleed S. Comparative study between laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal and open mesh hernioplasty in repair of non-complicated inguinal hernia. International Surgery Journal. 2019;7:24.

Elakkiya S, Deepu T. Comparison of outcomes of open hernioplasty- Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic trans abdominal preperitoneal mesh repair in patients with uncomplicated unilateral inguinal hernias. International Surgery Journal. 2019;6:2104.

Zhao G, Gao P, Ma B, Tian J, Yang K. Open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2009;250(1):35-42.

Shah AH, Rathod JB, Yagnik VD. A Comparative Study between Laparoscopic Hernia Repair and Open Lichtenstein Mesh Repair. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2017;21(9):1-8.

Faisal MF, Islam K, Khan MM, Biswas A, Azad MA, Reza MN. Early Clinical Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Vs. Open Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia 85. KYAMC Journal. 2019;10(2):85-9.

Leigh N, Anita GH, Olga J, Robert F, Dorothy D, James G et al. Open Mesh versus Laparoscopic Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia. The New England journal of medicine. 2004;350:1819-27.

Ahmed H, Ahmed A, Alaa R. Prospective trial comparing open approach of Lichtenstein tension-free mesh with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for repair of inguinal hernia: tertiary center experience. International Surgery Journal. 2019;6:3927.

Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):64-7.

Zilvinas D, Lina P, Vaidotas B, Antanas M. Laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia. Sveikatos mokslai / Health Sciences. 2017;27.

Hernia Surge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018;22(1):1-165.

EU. Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg. 2000;87(7):860-7.

Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R. Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2005;19(2):188-99.

Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain Suppl. 1986;3:S1-226.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13.