DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20221404

Study of collagen dressing and conventional dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer

R. Saravanan, S. Ram Prakash

Abstract


Background: Diabetic mellitus affects roughly 8.3% of the population in the United States, with more than 79 million people being pre-diabetic. Diabetic foot ulcers are one of the most serious and difficult consequences of diabetes mellitus to manage. Since the dawn of time, several therapy approaches have been tried. The treatment of diabetic foot ulcers has changed dramatically as technology and research have progressed, and the use of collagen dressings in diabetic foot ulcers remains one of them. In diabetic foot ulcers, a comparison of conventional and collagen dressings was made to determine the efficacy.

Methods: A prospective study was undertaken with 50 diabetic foot ulcer patients. Out of the 50 patients, 25 patients were subjected to collagen treatment and 25 patients to conventional treatment with normal saline.

Results: 80% granulation was observed in collagen treated group while there was no granulation was observed in the normal saline-treated group on day 7. The 62% epithelial tissue was present in the collagen treated group whereas 10% epithelial tissue was present in the normal saline-treated group on day 7.

Conclusions: Collagen dressing speeds wound healing in diabetic foot ulcer patients, lowering hospital stay and the necessity for split-thickness skin transplantation. Our research has led us to the conclusion that collagen dressings are superior to conventional dressings.

 


Keywords


Diabetic foot ulcer, Collagen, Normal saline-treated group, Collagen treated group

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lipsky BA. A report from the international consensus on diagnosing and treating the infected diabetic foot. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2004;20(S1):S68-77.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta, GA: US department of health and human services, centers for disease control and prevention. 2011;201(1):2568-9.

Huang Y, Cao Y, Zou M, Luo X, Jiang Y, Xue Y, Gao F. A comparison of tissue versus swab culturing of infected diabetic foot wounds. Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016.

May K. Preventing foot ulcers. Aust Prescr. 2008;31:94-6.

Andersen CA, Roukis TS. The Diabetic Foot. Surg Clin North Am. 2007;87(5):1149-77.

Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet. 2005;366:1719-24.

Reiber GEBE, Smith DG. Lower extremity foot ulcers and amputations in diabetes. Diab Am. 1995;2:409-27.

Van der Laan JS, Lopez GP, van Wachem PB, Nieuwenhuis P, Ratner BD, Bleichrodt RP et al. TFE-plasma polymerized dermal sheep collagen for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Int J Artif Organs 1991;14:661-6.

Sai KP, Babu M. Collagen based dressings-A review. Burns. 2000;26(1):54-62.

Botham KM, Murray RK. The extracellular matrix. Harper’s Illustrated Biochemistry. 27th edition. 2006;545-54.

Bao L, Yang W, Mao X, Mou S, Tang S. Agar/collagen membrane as skin dressing for wounds. Biomed Mater. 2008;3:044108.

Chattopadhyay S, Raines RT. Review collagen-based biomaterials for wound healing. Biopolymers 2014;101:821-33.

Yannas IV, Burke JF, Orgill DP, Skrabut EM. Wound tissue can utilize a polymeric template to synthesize a functional extension of skin. Science. 1982;215:174-6.

Nataraj C, Ritter G, Dumas S, Helfer FD, Brunelle J, Sander TW. Extracellular wound matrices: Novel stabilization and sterilization method for collagen-based biologic wound dressings. Wounds. 2007;19(6):148-56.

Park SN, Lee HJ, Lee KH, Suh H. Biological characterization of EDC-crosslinked collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix in dermal tissue restoration. Biomaterials. 2003;24(9):1631-41.

Lazovic G, Colic M, Grubor M, Jovanovic M. The application of collagen sheet in open wound healing. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2005;18(3):151-6.

Motta G, Ratto GB, De Barbieri A. Can heterologous collagen enhance the granulation tissue growth? An experimental study. Ital J Surg Sci. 1983;13(2):101-8.

Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT. A randomized, controlled trial of Promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Arch Surg. 2002;137(7):822-7.

Mishra, Mishra, Panigrahy, Baral, Gt P, Murmu. Collagen based vs conventional dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer-A comparative study. Int J Curr Res Rev 2021;13:108-13.

Singh O, Gupta S, Soni M, Moses S, Shukla S, Mathur R. Collagen dressing versus conventional dressings in burn and chronic wounds: A retrospective study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2011;4(1):12.

Rao H, Pai A, Hussein I, Ram HS, Pai A, Pai SR, Pain SG. A comparative study between collagen dressings and conventional dressings in wound healing. Int J Collaborative Res Internal Med Public Health. 2012;4(5):611-23.